Monday, September 19, 2011

Mashiach the Willow Tree

We will begin with a quote from the online essay, "Taking Responsibility For Ourselves" by Rabbi Yohonason Gifin.  This can be found here:  http://goo.gl/hFzTy.  It is on the parsha, Nitzavim (Deuteronomy 29:9-30:20).

"'This mitzvah that I command you today - it is not hidden from you and it is not distant. It is not in heaven, [for you] to say, 'who can ascend to the heaven for us and take it for us, so that we can listen to it and perform it?' What is the mitzvah that the Torah refers to in this verse? The Ramban writes that it is the mitzvah of teshuva (repentance); the Torah is telling us that teshuva is not something that is out of our grasp, rather it is easily attainable if only we make the effort."
This raises the question, how do the spiritually dead make the effort to turn from choosing sin to choosing life?   There is also the question of how G-d has made such efforts acceptable to Him, when it is He who said to Adam, 'On the day you eat of it, (the fruit forbidden to them), you will certainly die".  The answer can be found in the truth that the soul of Adam was not made in isolation from the soul of Mashiach, the soul of the Word of G-d.  Adam's soul, in the case of every sinner, is spiritually dead and does not possess the will nor the power to be perfectly free of the desire to sin.  Our souls cannot wake themselves from the sleep of death.  The tree that has been cut down cannot reattach itself to its roots. 

There is a tree that G-d has provided as a metaphor of hope in the world whose branches can grow new roots if they fall into water and can reach the wet earth below.  The willow is one such tree.  If such branches grow into trees have they saved the fallen tree?  Are they entirely new trees because they come from new roots?  The soul of Mashiach in relation to the soul of fallen Adam is like this.  However, the soul of Adam, the soul of a sinner, cannot use the soul of Mashiach, at its own will as a means to save itself from death.

The sentence of G-d to Adam that if they ate of the forbidden fruit they would die literally said that in dying they would die.  This emphatic form has been translated, "you will surely die,"   or, "you will certainly die".  In order to clearly bring out an essential facet of the meaning of this statement, we can, for a moment, translate it as, "you will end in death".  When arguing with Eve, the serpent did not change the language and say to her simply, "You will not die".  The serpent used the very same form of speech, which in the context of the temptation to rationalize the language of the commandment and its warning, can be seen to have meant, "You will not end in death."  Heard in this way, it is as if the serpents argument to Eve was to the effect that death itself is a part of the plan of G-d, part of His wisdom for the nature of the world.  If she were to embrace this wisdom, G-d could not leave her in death but would have to give her life beyond death.  This, in effect, is the assumption that Mashiach can be used by the sinner, by the mind and will of the sinner, as a way out of death. 

The truth is that Mashiach is like the branch of the willow and can bring life out of death but it is only through his own mind and his own will which is entirely obedient to the mind and will of G-d.  His will is to give himself to re-create all things.  It is only when Mashiach, the Son of Adam, revealed his sacrifice to Adam and Eve, that he kept the attachment of his soul to theirs by the will of G-d, that they saw the truth and repented.

 Later in the essay referred to above we read:
"The Tosefta says, 'Why did Judah merit the Kingship? Because he admitted [to his actions] in the incident of Tamar.' Tamar was about to be burned at the stake for her alleged act of adultery, when she gave Yehuda the chance to admit to his part in the events. He could easily have remained quiet, thereby sentencing three souls to death - Tamar and the twins inside her. However, in a defining moment in history, he bravely accepted accountability, saying, 'she is right, it is from me.' It is no coincidence that this was the key moment in producing the seed of the Messiah. We know that the Messiah is the person who will bring mankind back to its pristine state of before the sin, rectifying the mistake of Adam and Eve. The way in which to repair the damage done by a sin is by correcting the negative trait displayed in that sin. As we have seen, the main flaw present in Adam's sin was an inability to accept responsibility for mistakes, therefore Judah's success in taking responsibility for his actions was an ideal rectification."
What we must see is that the seed of Mashiach came through Judah because Judah's repentance was moved by the vision of Mashiach to come.  For it is Mashiach alone, the soul of Mashiach alone, who is able to accept the responsibility for sin without any influence from the inclination to sin in doing so. It is the spirit, the ruach of Mashiach moving us, moving through the whole soul of Adam, that enables the repentance that is essential for rectifying Humanity's sin of turning away from G-d in the beginning.  This is a repentance and rectification that must take place in each of us and in all Humanity as one soul.  This can come only through our acceptance and our embrace of the messianic corrections that G-d has determined for the world.  These messianic corrections for the world can come only through Israel, through the messianic redemption of Israel, through G-d's word of death and resurrection for Israel.  It is through the Good News of Israel and Her Messiah alone that the sin of Adam can be corrected and Adam, Humanity, can be saved and brought again to the place of a completely pure obedience to all that God says.


Link here to the Hearing Seven Thunders site and the series of posts on the Judgements in Exodus and the Judgements in the Book of the Revelation of Yehoshua the Mashiach of Israel.



Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Midnight Oil

While the maidens dance with their admiration for the groom the bride remains unseeing..., she does not recognize him who is hers... but the more she does not see him the more she describes him well, and so well that her anticipation grips her heart with its fist, and she calls for him to come to her but without voice because her heart is so tight with longing for him that it cannot breath. 

All the while her maidens dance and do not care for her pain at all, and some take actual pride in their advantage and fall to a blindness of their own in this - and how will they recover?  But others see her pain and slow their dancing and wonder at what they have to learn from her about her beloved and whether they have recognized him at all if they have not seen him through her eyes, and these will stand with her in the hour of her glory, for they sit up with the bride, even to midnight, and have filled their lamps with oil.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Yearning for Moshiach


Posted from: http://www.ascentofsafed.com 
Story #715 (s5771-49) 8 Menachem-AV 5771 
From the desk of Yerachmiel Tilles 

The tzadik Rabbi Yitzchak of Radvil, having heard of the greatness of Rabbi Avraham Hamalach [“the Angel” – son of the Maggid of Mezritch], decided to travel to see him. He arrived on Erev Tisha B'av. That night, as everyone sat on the floor of the shul reading Eicha [“Book of Lamentations”] and mourning the destruction of the first two Holy Temples, a bitter cry suddenly broke out. Rabbi Yitzchak turned and saw “the Angel” sitting with his head between his knees, weeping bitterly. Long after everyone had left, he continued watching Rabbi Avraham, who sat in the same position without moving. When the clock struck midnight, Rabbi Yitzchak retired for the night.

The following morning, Rabbi Yitzchak arrived early to shul and found Rabbi Avraham Hamalach still mourning, a puddle of tears surrounding him, From time to time, he would lift his holy head and ask in a pained voice, "He's still not here?"
*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *
Other tzadikim living during the time of the tzadik Rabbi Moshe Teitelbaum, the Yismach Moshe, said that he was a reincarnation of Yirmiyahu Hanovi [the prophet Jeremiah), who prophesied the destruction of the first Holy Termple. The Yismach Moshe would constantly cry about the exile, especially during the Three Weeks, and his longing for Moshaich was remarkable. Next to his bed, his finest Shabbat clothing lay prepared, and before sleeping he would warn his attendant to wake him the moment the shofar blast of Moshiach was heard. Whenever he heard some bustle in the street, he would run to determine whether Moshiach had arrived.

Once, a notice arrived to his home that on a coming date his beloved son-in-law would be arriving for a visit. This caused a stirring of great joy and everyone prepared for his arrival. The special day came, but the visitor was nowhere to be seen, and the family became restless, imagining possible reasons for his delay. The Yismach Moshe sat in his room engrossed in learning, while some family members stood outside waiting impatiently. Suddenly a carriage was seen in the distance. The Rebbe's attendant ran in to bring the tzadik the good news, "Rebbe, he has arrived!"

Hearing this, the Rebbe jumped from his place in excitement, put on his fine Shabbat garments, including kapota (long black frock-coat and shtreimel (elaborate, round fur hat) and ran outside toward the approaching carriage. Seeing none other than his son-in-law descending from the carriage, he was unable to bear the pain and fell to the ground in a faint. When his family revived him, they heard him moaning to himself, "Oy! It's not him. He still has not yet arrived."
*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *
The chief Rabbi (a century ago) of Jerusalem, Rabbi Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld, related that as a student learning in the yeshiva (of the Chatam Sofer) in Pressburg, he once overheard a woman ask her friend what she had prepared for supper.

"Squash," the other replied.

"And for tomorrow?" the woman questioned further.

"Chas v'shalom [Heaven forbid]! Don't speak like that! If Heaven forbid Moshiach does not come by tomorrow, then I will make lentils [a food often associated with mourning]."

Source: Adapted by Yerachmiel Tilles from passages in Lma'an Yishme'u #72, <avreicheilubavitch @gmail.com>.

Connection: Seasonal – Tisha B’Av.

Biographical notes:
R. Avraham the Malach ("the Angel") [1739 - 12 Tishrei 1776] was the son of Rabbi Dov Ber, the Maggid of Mezritch. While still a young man he chose an ascetic and secluded lifestyle, and on his father's passing in1772 declined to assume leadership of the chasidic movement. He wrote a work entitled Chesed L’Avraham, and died at the age of 37. His only son, Rabbi Shalom Shachna of Probisht, was the father of Rabbi Yisrael of Ruzhin.

Rabbi Moshe Teitelbaum [1759-28 Tammuz 1841], known as the Yismach Moshe after the title of his book of Torah commentary, was famed both as a scholar and wonderworker. A disciple of the Seer of Lublin, he was instrumental in the spread of Chasidut in Hungary. His descendants founded the dynasties of Satmar and Sighet.

Sunday, August 7, 2011

LAMENTATIONS CHAPTER 5 - Judaic Commentary


Study Notes by Avraham ben Yaakov


"Remember, HaShem, what has come upon us; look and see our shame" (v 1). The concluding chapter of EICHAH, unlike all the previous chapters, is not an alphabetical acrostic. It is a prayerful elegy enumerating the painful details of Israel's terrible suffering at the hands of the nations throughout their various exiles.

"Because of this our heart is faint" (v 17). The Hebrew word translated here as "faint" has the connotation of menstrual impurity (cf. Lev. 12:2, 15:33 & 20:18). In the words of the Midrash: "On account of the fact that a menstruating woman has to separate herself from her house for a number of days, the Torah calls her 'faint'. How much more so are we – who have been separated from the House of our life and from our Temple for so many days and so many years – called 'faint', and that is why it says, 'Because of this our heart is faint'" (Eichah Rabbah).

"But You, HaShem, dwell forever… Why do You forget us forever and forsake us for so long? Turn us to You, HaShem, and we will return; renew our days as of old!" (vv 19-21).

With this prayer for God to turn our hearts to Him in repentance the Elegist concludes EICHAH – AYEKAH? "Where are you???" – a call to repent. Since verse 22 has a negative tone, it is customary to repeat verse 21 thereafter in order to conclude the reading of EICHAH on a positive note.

This final chapter of EICHAH is included in the readings included in TIKKUN RACHEL, which is the first part of TIKKUN CHATZOS, the Midnight Prayer, recited every night by the very devout. TIKKUN RACHEL consisting of laments over the destruction of the Temple is recited only on those weekdays on which Tachanun is recited but not on Sabbaths, festivals and other days with a semi-festive character. However, the second part of TIKKUN CHATZOS, known as TIKKUN LEAH, may be recited every night of the year (see "The Sweetest Hour" by Rabbi Avraham Greenbaum, Breslov Research Institute).


Subscribe to Rabbi Greenbaum's commentary notes here > knowbible@azamra.org



LAMENTATIONS CHAPTER 4 - Judaic Commentary


Study Notes by Avraham ben Yaakov
from Azamra.org


As discussed in the commentary on EICHAH Chapter 1, the elegy contained here in Chapter 4 was said by the rabbis of the Talmud to have been composed by Jeremiah on the death of the saintly King Josiah in Megiddo at the hands of Pharaoh Necho (II Chronicles 35:25; Rashi ad loc.).

"How is the gold become dim!" (v 1) – "This lament was said over Josiah, and with it he wove in the other children of Zion" (Rashi on v 1). Rashi here is explaining why it is that if this is an elegy for Josiah, almost all of its contents relate not specifically to the slain king but to the entire people. The elegy is truly about the loss of Josiah, whose importance lay in the fact that he "went in the ways of David his father without turning to the right or the left" (II Chron. 34:2). As such Josiah was the last hope of Judah – had he had time to complete his mission of bringing the people to genuine repentance, he could have saved Jerusalem from destruction, and thus he had the potential to be Mashiach (as he is indeed called here in verse 20). But he was cut down in his very prime and his death sealed the fate of Jerusalem, making the destruction of the Temple and the cruel exile all but inevitable.

Thus with the death of Josiah twenty-two years prior to the actual destruction, Jeremiah already prophesied the horrors of the coming calamity. "The hallowed stones are poured out at the top of every street" (v 1) – "these are the children, who radiated like precious jewels. And there is also a Midrash telling that Jeremiah gathered every cupful of blood that flowed out of each of Josiah's arrow wounds and buried it in its place, chanting, 'The hallowed stones have been poured out…'" (Rashi on v 1).

The children are cast out like broken shards (v 2). Their starving mothers, who ignore their pleas for food in order to find something to eat themselves, have been reduced to a cruelty that even jackals do not show to their young (v 3, see Rashi). Those brought up in the lap of luxury are thrown out on the streets clutching at the garbage heaps (v 5). Even as Jeremiah depicts the horror, he weaves in his teaching about its cause: "For the sin of the daughter of my people is greater…" (v 6). The fire that was to consume Zion was from God (v 11). The enemy was able to do the unthinkable and enter the gates of Jerusalem "on account of the sins of her prophets, the transgressions of her priests" (vv 12-13).

Verse 15 portrays the terrible victimization of Israel in their places of exile, rejected as an unclean caste by the sanctimonious nations. The face of anger God shows them in their exile is the penalty for their having failed to give the proper respect to their priests and elders in their time of tranquility (v 16, see Rashi).

"As for us, our eyes do yet fail for our vain help: in our watching we have watched for a nation that could not save" (v 17). The kings of Judah who followed Josiah expected that Egypt would intervene to save Israel from the clutches of Babylon, but in vain (see Rashi ad loc.). In our time it seems that many in Israel somehow expect the country they see as her closest ally to come to her defense, but as the threats around little Israel grow ever more menacing with the apparent complicity of her ally, it seems that any hopes that this ally will ever help may also prove to have been in vain.

After the Elegist's depiction of the horrors of the calamity that was to come as a result of the death of Josiah, we now understand why it was such a disaster that "The breath of our nostrils, HaShem's anointed, has been captured in their pits – he of whom we said, Under his shadow we shall live among the nations" (v 20).

The concluding verses of this elegy promise that God will take vengeance upon the nations that persecuted Israel and destroyed the Temple. Although Jeremiah was living at the time of the destruction of the First Temple by the Babylonians, he already sees prophetically to the eventual destruction of Edom, i.e. Rome, which perpetrated the destruction of the Second Temple.

Targum on verse 21 identifies "the daughter of Edom who dwells in the land of Ootz" with "KOUSTANTINA (=Constantinople), the city of the wicked Edom that was built in the land of Armenia with a great population from the people of Edom – upon you too is He destined to bring punishment, and the Persians will destroy you…" Constantinople was indeed until its demise in the Middle Ages the center of the Latin Empire, which was actually called the Roman Empire. The Talmudic rabbis had a tradition that "Rome is destined to fall by the hand of Persia" (Yoma 10a) and "this will take place just before the coming of Mashiach" (Tosfos on Avodah Zarah 2b). Zion's punishment will then be complete and they will know no more exile (v 22).

LAMENTATIONS COMMENTARY CHAPTER 5

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Root of The Soul


"By his sense of smell (his 'holy spirit') the Mashiach will know how to connect each Jewish soul to its Divine root, and thereby identify its tribe (branch) in Israel."

http://www.inner.org/times/cheshvan/cheshvan.htm

<> } MellowWolf Notes:  Reflections on 'root of soul'

If we say that the root of the soul is in the place prior to the Tzimtzum, is this to say that it is in the place prior to creation?

But is this to say something other than that which Paul says, that all things were created in Christ/Mashiach?

Language itself is challenged in this question.

Here is also where we see that it is impossible to truly speak about the precise relationship between God and the word of God, between God and Mashiach.  There are two reasons for this.  First it is the fallen mind that cannot think or speak of truth on a level that there can be no shadow.  Second it was forbidden to Adam to do this.  Rectification must be in intentionally not attempting to do this.

When we attempt to speak precisely of the relationship of the Father and the Son we stop the rectification of Adam's disobedience.

If someone says that their heart knows what it means when it says that the Jewish soul is an aspect of God and therefore can say this in  public, this person must take responsibility for the fact that to the fallen mind of Adam they are saying that the Jewish soul is not actually created but merely incarnated within creation.  It is no differernt than the Christian who says that Jesus is God.  They may think that their heart knows what it means but the fallen mind of Adam can only agree with them by conceiving idolatry.

How is it then possible to even talk about this at all?  That both Judaism and Christianity are prone to talk about this, each in their own way, says that even if they do not understand one another their hearts are drawn to the same place.  But what is that place and is it possible to talk about it more clearly, so that all those who are drawn to it may understand one another clearly?

There is a way, which we know, because the Bible speaks about this place of the Jewish soul of Mashiach before the Tzimtzum, and we know that in the Bible and in its language there is no idolatry.  One way that the Bible speaks about this in in terms of the firstborn and the secret of the firstborn.

LAMENTATIONS CHAPTER 3 - Judaic Commentary


Study Notes by Avraham ben Yaakov

Like Chapters 1, 2 and 4 of EICHAH, Chapter 3 takes the form of an acrostic built upon the Aleph-Beis, except that in this case each of the letters of the Aleph-Beis is used in succession as the initial letter of three short verses or triplets.

"I am the man who has seen affliction by the rod of His wrath" (v 1). Starting with this verse, the first six triplets in this elegy (vv 1-18) all pour forth from the heart of the Elegist himself – a righteous prophet – complaining that God has set him up as His target: "He is to me like a bear lying in wait and like a lion in secret places" (v 10). The entire passage is somewhat reminiscent of Job's complaints that God was tormenting him for no reason, and the rabbis of the Midrash point to a GEZERAH SHAVAH (identical phrase in two disparate texts indicating a midrashic connection between the two) between the first verse of our present chapter, "I am the man (GEVER)…", and a verse in Job where his interlocutor Eli-hoo criticizes him, saying "Which man (GEVER) is like Job, who drinks up scorning like water?" (Job 34:7). "Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi commented: 'I am the man…' – I am the same as Job, of whom it is written, 'Which man is like Job, who drinks up scorning like water?' Everything You brought upon Job, You have brought upon me!" (Eichah Rabbah). The Elegist is simultaneously pouring out his own pain and giving expression to the national pain. Rashi on v 1 explains the pain of Jeremiah himself: Jeremiah was complaining that he "witnessed greater affliction than all the other prophets who prophesied about the destruction of the Temple, because it was not destroyed in their days but in mine!"

In Job's case it was Eli-hoo who brought him to understand that although he may have been righteous, he had perhaps not been righteous enough and that was why he suffered. But in the case of the present elegy here in EICHAH, it is Jeremiah himself who is in dialog with the thoughts in his own heart, and simultaneously with those in the hearts of his people, who felt that the cruelty of their plight meant that God had become their enemy. [Many have felt similarly about the Holocaust.] "And I said, My strength and my hope are perished from HaShem" (v 18). But immediately after this expression of despair, there is a change in the tone of the elegy in the seventh triplet (vv 19-21). Having given expression to the real feelings of despair in his heart, Jeremiah begins to pray to God to remember his suffering even as his soul is bowed down within him, and he discovers how to reply to that inner voice of despair: "With this shall I give an answer to my heart, therefore I have hope" (v 21).

The ensuing message of hope begins in the beautiful passage in vv 22ff: God's kindnesses and mercies are truly unending. They are renewed every morning! It is this gives the Elegist the courage to address God directly: "Great is Your faithfulness!" (v 23). Since we can rely on the constant renewal of God's kindness, there is always hope, and because there is always hope, it is fitting for man to bear his suffering patiently in the knowledge that God sends it for his own ultimate benefit. Having delicately reached this point, Jeremiah now teaches the suffering people the proper way to respond to their suffering. [1] We must always wait for God's salvation (v 26). [2] It is necessary to bear our suffering with patience (v 27). [3] We must "sit alone and keep silent"(v 28) – i.e. enter into deep personal self-reckoning without railing against fate. Here in EICHAH is one of the foundations of the pathway of HISBODEDUS – secluded meditation and prayer – that Rabbi Nachman of Breslov emphasized more than anything. [4] We must "put our mouths in the dust" (v 29). Dust or earth is =APHAR, the vessel that receives the three higher elements of Fire, Air and Water. APHAR is MALCHUS, the acceptance of God's kingship, which we do through prayer. [5] We must "turn the other cheek" to our detractors (v 30), for it is through the silence in which we bear their insults that we attain God's glory (Likutey Moharan I, 6).

Continuing on his delicate path of helping the people to accept and come to terms with their suffering, the Elegist explains beginning in the eleventh triplet (vv 31ff) that God will not reject Israel forever (v 31), and that if He has afflicted them, He will eventually have mercy (v 32), for His chastisements are not sent arbitrarily (v 33ff). Addressing deep questions about the justice of God's providence (which is also the subject of the book of Job) Jeremiah affirms that the Righteous God never twists any man's judgment, and that nothing in the world comes about except through the command of the King (v 37).

"Out of the mouth of the Most High do not the bad things come and the good?" (v 38). The original Hebrew words of this verse are necessarily susceptible to a variety of interpretations that may even appear contradictory to one another. This is because the verse contains the mystery of how good and evil emanate from the One God, who is perfect goodness. Rashi (ad loc.) paraphrases: "If I were to come to say that it was not from His hands that this evil came upon me but that it was a chance occurrence that happened to me, this is not so. For whether bad things or good things occur, 'Who is this that spoke and it came to be if not that HaShem commanded it?' (v 37)… 'Why then does a man complain while he yet lives, a man over the punishment of his sins?' (v 39). Each man must complain about his own sins because it is they that bring evil upon him. 'From the mouth of the Supreme it does not go forth' (v 38): Rabbi Yohanan said, From the day that the Holy One blessed be He said, 'See, I have set before you life and goodness, death and evil' (Deut. 30:15) [i.e. man has been given free will], 'the bad and the good do not go forth from His mouth', but rather, evil comes by itself to those who do bad while goodness comes to those who do good. Therefore what should a man complain and be upset about if not about his own sins?" (Rashi on v 38).

The moral is clear: "Let us examine and search out our ways and return to HaShem" (v 40). "Let us lift up our HEARTS to our HANDS to God in heaven" (v 41) – It is not enough merely to stretch out our HANDS in prayer: our HEARTS must be in our prayers – we must be sincere and mean what we say, not like those who "immerse in the mikveh while still clutching the defiling unclean creature in their hand", verbally expressing their intention to repent while still holding onto their bad ways (see Taanis 16a).

"We have sinned and rebelled, but You have not forgiven us" (v 42). This verse marks a transition from the Elegist's exhortations about prayer and repentance to a further outpouring of the pain, grief and tears caused by Israel's protracted suffering – for he knows that even his wise advice in the previous section (vv 21-41) cannot that quickly assuage the pain and hurt. Yes, we continue to weep –and we will weep "until Hashem will look down and see from heaven" (v 50). Again and again the Elegist delicately steers us back to knowing that we must turn only to God. "I called Your Name, HaShem, from the bottommost pit" (v 55). The following verse, "You have heard my voice; hide not Your ear at my sighing" (v 56) is among the six verses customarily chanted in unison by the congregation immediately prior to the blowing of the Shofar in the synagogue on Rosh HaShanah.

The final section of this elegy (vv 57-66) are a ringing affirmation of faith that God will redeem Israel and wreak His vengeance on their enemies for all their evil.

LAMENTATIONS COMMENTARY CHAPTER 4